I'm a big fan of the James Bond film series but I'm also one
of the first to admit that very few of the films are perfect. In fact,
sometimes watching several of the older James Bond films (and some of the newer
ones too) is a process of overlooking the problems to enjoy the whole. Such is the case with the Man with the Golden Gun. There's a lot of good in this movie
but the problems are numerous starting with the most obvious - the return of
the Louisiana
sheriff character from the previous film LIVE AND LET DIE (1973) . In LALD he
was a mildly humorous or sadly annoying asshole character depending on your
tolerance for hick/redneck caricatures. He stuck out as dumb and unnecessary
but he didn't make the film less effective or credible. Such is not the case
with J. W. Pepper's appearance in THE MAN WITH THE GOLDEN GUN. He pops up with
his wife on vacation in Thailand
and just so happens to cross paths with Bond at the right time to be involved
in a high speed care chase. This series of events are so unlikely and so
clearly the product of the writers being forced to bring the character back for
a second go round that it would be a sore point even if the character never
entered the action. And his scenes underscore one of the biggest problems the
Bond series built for itself in the 1970's which is that somehow in the world
of these films James Bond is publically known to be a British spy. WTF? This
became a reoccurring point in the Moore
years and each time it is mentioned as it is in this film it destroys the flimsy
artificial world that the series has built up.
I rewatched this the other night because I wanted to see
Christopher Lee's Scaramanga character again but I was dreading the film
overall. My memory was that this was a very disappointing Bond outing and there
was little beyond the scenery to recommend it. But this time around I found
myself enjoying the film more than my last watch. Indeed, I finally enjoyed the
pre-credit sequence for what it is - a darker version of the Kato vs. Clouseau
battle/training sequences from the Pink Panther films. Plus, Lee is really good
in the role even if I wish the script had worked harder to draw out the 'two
sides of the same coin' aspect of his and Bond's characters. As it stands it's
brought up and dismissed in the course of one dinner scene so that it feels far
too truncated - almost an afterthought.
Sill, I liked MWTGG more this time than when I watched it about five years ago. It still has the same problems and failings but its
strengths stood out more prominently for me this time. I liked seeing Bond as a
tough, abusive jerk when he threatens Maud Adams's character because it is what
he would be given his situation in the story. I always prefer the gentlemanly
aspect of Bond to be a thin veneer hiding the violent man beneath and here Moore was still willing
to play the character that way. He softened him over the next couple of films
until the darker Bond final returned in FOR YOUR EYES ONLY (1981).
THE MAN WITH THE GOLDEN GUN will never be one of my
favorites of the series but I now feel good putting it in the 'plus' column -
but just barely.
3 comments:
The stupid whistle sound during the spiral car jump and the third nipple are problems I had with it along with what you mentioned. For Your Eyes Only gets a lot of hate from fans, although I think it's Moore's second best outing. It would have been cool to see Christopher Lee in Dr.No. What are your top five favorite and bottom three Bond films?
Bottom three are YOU ONLY LIVE TWICE, MOONRAKER and A VIEW TO A KILL. Top three are ON HER MAJESTY'S SECRET SERVICE, CASINO ROYALE and FROM RUSSIA WITH LOVE.
My top five are OHMSS, Thunderball, Casino Royale, From Russia with Love, and both of Dalton's tied. Bottom three are Moonraker, A View to a Kill and Die Another Day.
Post a Comment