As someone on record as a big fan of MAN OF STEEL and the much
derided BATMAN V SUPERMAN it's fair to assume that I was quite excited to see
DC Comic's newest cinematic effort. I figure I had better enjoy this run of
darker superhero films while they last because the general bitching about their
more adult nature will eventually destroy them. Sadly it appears that the
frantic worrying about this has already hit the series with SUICIDE SQUAD. I
was extremely excited when I learned that David Ayer was making this film
because his WWII tank film FURY was an unexpected surprise. Dark, realistic and
unflinching in its treatment of it's characters it was as if the film was
calculated to show the hidden truths underneath all those great war movies of
the past. I hoped that Ayer was going to turn that creative eye toward
superheroes and from what I can tell that is what he did. Then the second
guessing happened and we end up with this.
The first 45 minutes are a chopped up mess that shows that
too many bosses were allowed in the editor's room. The film has a lot of story to
tell us but it's as if there was no final choice made on exactly how to present things.
The tales of the various characters get thrown into a blender and almost
randomly shown to us through a series of flashbacks. That eventually makes it
difficult to know when what we are witnessing is actually happening. It feels like
the filmmakers had no confidence that we'd have the patience for all this
character stuff and so contrived to just spasm-edit it all into an info dump. That
was a mistake. A second error was the slash editing of rock tunes into the
soundtrack almost randomly. Just as I started to get a handle on what the hell
was going on suddenly another everybody-knows-this-one rock song blared out of
the screen telling me I should smile now. No, no, no, no! I realize that the
film is trying to use each song as an identifier for each character but it does
not work that way. One might have been effective, maybe even two but when you
get to three we all get it and we're looking for the mute button.
But..... once the plot begins to move, we know the villains
of the piece, the Joker's plan to grab Harley comes together and all Hell
breaks loose I enjoyed the rest of the film. In fact, if there is ever a
re-edit of this thing that gives us more of the character introductions,
smoothes out the choppy editing and gets us into the rhythm of the story faster
it might be a damned good movie instead of an OK effort robbed of it's possible
glory. You can see the dark, funny beauty of the original vision peeking out from around the corners where it was shoved. Stop second guessing a film - once
it's made leave it alone!
My original plan was to get drunk and then go see INDEPENDENCE DAY:
RESURGENCE (2016). The film had finally appeared (for a single week) at the $2
theater and I could think of few things more fun than an inebriated viewing of
a Roland Emmerich film. He and his team of talent-negative morons have never
mastered the fine art of making good or even passable films so you always know
the movie will suck in surprising ways. The first INDEPENDENCE DAY is still my benchmark for
awful science fiction scriptwriting. I remember watching that mess on the big
screen and wondering just how such a stupid script could be green lit for
millions of dollars. It was so dumb I suspected it had been written by a third
grader who rushed though the project to get out onto the playground. But it got
made and made a zillion dollars so now we have this crap - an even dumber
retread of the same idiotic idea only new! It is, of course, loud and packed
with explosions none of which have any weight or relevance. Every plot point is
telegraphed, every surprise obvious, every situation clichéd and all the dialog
is pedantic. The film is dull, stupid and insulting. When I hear people
bitching about big summer blockbusters THIS is what I picture and I like big
summer blockbusters. Can't someone make Emmerich stop? Please. I wish I had actually followed my plan and gotten drunk.
I had no real interest in seeing this new version of THE
JUNGLE BOOK (2016) but I'm glad I checked it out. It's a sharp and often
touching retelling of the classic tale with state of the art CGI bringing the
animals to life quite well. The bright, detailed visualization of the jungle is
gorgeous always capable of seeming both welcoming and dangerous. The young actor
playing Mowgli is good and the entire tale feels well paced with little wasted narrative
that isn't built into the story effectively. All the voice work is excellent
and they even managed to work in the greatest Disney song of all time (in my
grinning opinion) The Bare Necessities! Good job on every count.
THE LIST
THE
BEES (1978) - 2 (rewatch)
BEACH
PARTY (1963) - 4 (silly AIP musical comedy)
SUICIDE
SQUAD (2016) - 6 (first half's a mess
but it finally finds its feet)
EMBRYO
(1976) - 6 (interesting science fiction tale with Rock Hudson)
PASSPORT
TO SUEZ
(1943) - 6 (solid Lone Wolf film that steals several plot elements from CASABLANCA )
SANTO
VS. DR. DEATH (1973) - 8
THE
'BURBS (1989) - 6 (rewatch)
BLACK
TORMENT (1964)- 6 (solid gothic mystery)
CRY_WOLF
(2005) - 7 (rewatch) (solid murder mystery with a great end scene)
A
CANDLE FOR THE DEVIL (1973)- 7 (rewatch)
THE
TRIAL OF SERGEANT RUTLEDGE (1960) - 6 (solid late period John Ford western)
KISS
KISS, KILL KILL (1966) - 7 (fun Euro-spy adventure)
DARK
ALIBI (1946) - 5 (not bad Charlie Chan mystery)
BATMAN
V SUPERMAN: DAWN OF JUSTICE (2016) - 9 (ultimate edition)
THE
PHANTOM OF PARIS (1931)- 6 (good Gaston Leroux adaptation)
BLACK
SABBATH (1963) - 9 (rewatch of the Italian version)
THE
JUNGLE BOOK (2016) - 8
DESIGN
FOR LIVING (1933) - 7 (amusing but too light)
FIRST
MAN INTO SPACE (1959) - 5
THE
OUTSIDER (2013) - 8 (documentary about Antonio Margheriti)
5 comments:
Now be honest, did Margot Robbies hot pants have anything to do with your rating?
A little. ;-)
Truly, there is a lot of great stuff in the film and you can tell Ayers had a vision but it got chopped to hell and back.
I've been thinking about rewatching Embryo. It's been about six years since I've seen it. I remember liking the end when she is elderly and goes into labor then Rock Hudson tries to kill her.
As the Space Hippies said to Mr. Spock: "We reach!"
Glad to know I'm not so alone in loving MAN OF STEEL and BVS. With them I finally -- after 40+ years! -- got the version of Superman I'd always wanted to see: More Sci-Fi and much less silliness. The Ultimate Cut of BVS thrilled me... I haven't seen SUICIDE SQUAD yet (and your mini-review gives me pause), but I rate MOS and BVS higher than any Marvel film to date -- and I definitely enjoy the MCU. The DC films simply have an epic scale and operatic quality to them that Marvel hasn't matched.
You put it very well Brian - there is a scope and beauty to MOS and BVS that - as much as I love the Marvel films - isn't present elsewhere. It pisses me off that fanboy bitching will kill a chance at a mature version of this universe.
Post a Comment