Monday, July 13, 2020

Video - Alpha-Bits Cereal Monster Commercials




These vintage TV ads for breakfast cereal make my Monster Kid heart happy. The cereal - not so much. 

Saturday, July 11, 2020

COBRA (1986) or Hubris, Thy Name is Stallone


Every film fanatic has a list of movies that they love but cannot defend. Often these are movies that were first experienced in childhood and the intense nostalgia overrides later, more adult perceptions of quality. Then there are films that are simply so bad in certain specific ways that the entertainment value of the entire piece is tied directly to its awfulness. In these cases it almost becomes impossible for the enthusiast to refrain from proselytizing about the joys of the terrible film in question. For me COBRA (1986) is one of those movies.

Wrongheaded in nearly every way and idiotic to the point of brain death COBRA (1986) is in many ways the peak of 1980’s action madness. Sylvester Stallone was riding high as one of the decade’s most profitable stars churning out sequels interspersed with more interesting box office duds (NIGHTHAWKS, ESCAPE TO VICTORY) and epic bad choices (writing & directing STAYING ALIVE, RHINESTONE). Clearly the sequels were what was making the cash so Sly decided it was time he expanded his franchise list beyond Rocky and Rambo movies (which he is STILL making to this day). He wanted a cop character like Eastwood’s Dirty Harry and COBRA was his stab at the rogue cop genre. As this film was to finish out a trilogy of franchises for Stallone there was the boneheaded logic that the previous two were five letter titles and so another five-letter titled film would beget an ongoing series of films set in the land of cops and robbers. If you're imagining the word 'hubris' in very large bold letters possibly with blinking lights attached, you're on the right track. As there was no sequel he clearly failed.


Stallone wrote COBRA’s pompous script adapting it from a novel that just has to be better than the finished film and hired his hand-picked hand puppet George Pan Cosmotos to direct. Rocky was his most successful franchise in the mid-80’s and with ROCKY III (1982) he had managed to begin its turn into a cartoon by introducing Mr. T to the world (for better or worse). The previous year’s FIRST BLOOD (1982) sequel RAMBO: FIRST BLOOD PART 2 (1985) had turned his main character of John Rambo into an invincible video game avatar so perhaps by this time the die was cast. (Rambo even became an actual Saturday morning cartoon character by 1986.) I’m not sure if Stallone’s edict that the film needed to be edited down to less than 90 minutes so that an extra screening could be scheduled each day in each theater helped or hurt this mess. A longer version of this would be only dumber, I suspect. Perhaps there is a cut someplace with even more shots of Stallone posing with his snake-emblazoned handgun after enacting bloody vengeance? Surely, there were more scenes in which he chews on a toothpick to show his world-weary outlook on life? Or another self-righteous speech about how cops killing monsters is just the way it is! Hell – I’d watch it.


If you’ve never seen the film it can be difficult to explain its stupidity. The villains are an over the top death cult that seems to exist in a Clive Barker inspired nightmare warehouse where they chant and clank axes together. Somehow these rejects from a slasher film are interested in killing the weak of society but in practice they seem to just be preying on whoever they run across randomly. In a film where every character is ill-defined these silly monsters are the worst. The only reason they seem to exist is to be an army of bad guys that we can happily watch be mown down by the righteous cop. They might as well be made of pixels.


To show how awesome Stallone’s bad-ass cop is he drives a tricked out 1950 Chevy that might as well be a freakin’ Bat-mobile once we are shown its various gadgets. To one up Dirty Harry the film casts Andrew Robinson who played Scorpio in the 1971 film as Cobra’s police boss just so Stallone can make him look like a wimpy jerk in every scene they share. If Eastwood’s Harry was thought of as a fascistic thug fifteen years before then Cobra is that idea on crack. Cobra is Dirty Harry if Harry had never finished the eighth grade. By the time Stallone wedges in some poor attempts at humorous dialog about junk food between the killer cop and his partner we realize that the character onscreen has no reality at all. He’s a point and shoot dufus in mirrored shades, black gloves and tight jeans. There is no ‘there’ there. But that is probably why I enjoy watching this pathetic excuse for a film. It’s so damned bad that it kind of finds a way to be nearly perfect. A perfect film in which nearly ever choice made was wrongly decided. A film in which even the film stock seems to have been poorly chosen. A movie filled with nonsense and bad ideas and hilarious right-wing blather masquerading as learned wisdom. A movie in which a machine gun shot through a windshield can cause a truck to explode. A movie so damned stupid that it just might be the American 1980’s distilled down to 87 minutes of celluloid madness. It is a time capsule that puts the lie to the trendy worship of that benighted decade! The 1980’s is COBRA (1986) – long may it kill brain cells! He’s the cure and crime is the disease! Kick on the neon lights and clank your axes together!


Thursday, July 09, 2020

Trailers From Hell - HALF HUMAN (1958)



Should I tell Mr. Dante that I've seen the uncut Japanese version of this with subtitles? 

Monday, July 06, 2020

The Bloody Pit #108 - TWINS OF EVIL (1971)


Mark Maddox returns to discuss another Hammer film!

Things became very different for vampire films in the 1970’s. Topics that used to be ignored or, at most, alluded to were suddenly able to be placed front and center in the narrative. No longer did a blood sucker’s victim have to merely cower in fear. Now they could react with lust or the real desire for the monster to put the bite on their necks to show the attraction these creatures might generate as part of their appeal. The sexual side of vampires could become a central part of the story allowing the carnal needs of both monster and victim to be explored. TWINS OF EVIL (1971) takes a pair of identical looking young girls on the cusp of becoming women and shows us two different reactions to a vampire’s sex appeal. The film clearly has a point of view but it is possible to read some darker ideas in the story as well.

We start by discussing the loose Karnstien trilogy that TWINS OF EVIL (1971) concludes. Then we move into a broad talk about the tone of Hammer films’ output during the 1970’s and how the studio became more of a place for independent productions guided by the old guard than a production house. This approach created a less controlled but very interesting run of movies that allowed for experimentation in both style and story as the public’s attention wandered away from the classic gothic horror model Hammer had epitomized since 1957. So even if new settings were not to too quickly embraced, fresh elements could be folded into the tales. This meant more adult themes, more  violence and as much nudity as they could get away with! We talk about how this film also manages to put religious hypocrisy front and center and embodies it in one of Hammer’s most iconic actors, Peter Cushing. I argue in the show that this is one of Cushing’s best performances for the studio because the script gives him an arc to play unlike his usual villain or hero roles.


If you have any comments about the show please write us at thebloodypit@gmail.com to let us know what is on your mind. Is this your favorite of the Karnstien films? Thank you for listening and we’ll be back soon.

Apple Podcast LINK

Direct Download LINK






Saturday, July 04, 2020

Happy 4th of July!








You may have detected a theme in this year's images. 

Wednesday, July 01, 2020

Jungle Movie Summer









I think that it's the heat that has me watching these movies. 
Yeah. 
The heat. That's it! 

Monday, June 29, 2020

Beyond Naschy #31 - THE BLANCHEVILLE MONSTER (1963)


THE BLANCHEVILLE MONSTER (1963) is a gothic horror film set in 1884 which has a small cast of characters wandering around a huge castle-like home searching for different things. At times the castle search is for the origin of a strange nighttime noise (Is that a man moaning in pain?) or for a missing companion (Did they go down to the dungeons for some reason?). Sound familiar? But, in the end, everyone is searching for both romance and the answer to a family mystery. Well, usually that’s what happens in these types of movies. Actually, this film throws us several curveballs by, at first, having a haunting mystery at its center (“Oh, you silly dear. You didn’t really see what you clearly saw.”) and then tossing it out for a darker plot involving disfigurement, madness and murderous intent. It all revolves around family curses so at least that aspect of gothic tales is kept all the way through!

Troy and I step carefully through this film’s dark corridors holding our candelabras aloft searching for the meaning of it all. We discuss the Gothic Romance as a genre and I outline my newer understanding of it. We talk about the usual tropes of these tales and the ways in which this one adheres and deviates from them. I was actually shocked that there was no incest! The period setting and real castle locations work well to create a fair amount of atmosphere and the fact that we can almost always see the actor’s breath adds to the chilly mood. It is really a shame that this movie’s status as a Public Domain work continues to keep a good looking print available. The black and white photography cries out for sharp resolution without the dark, muddy smearing that obscures from view the efforts of the legendary cinematographer Alejandro Ulloa. I sincerely hope that we one day get a remastered version of this interesting film. And did I mention the Helga Line is in this? 

We end the show with a new instrumental song called Mystery Machine from Troy’s band The Exotic Ones. This tune is on their forthcoming EP and it drops in the next few days. Check it out! The podcasters can be reached at naschycast@gmail.com with any comments or suggestions. As is evidenced by this episode we do take advice from listeners, so add your voice to the proceedings. We’re always interested in what Naschy related films we could cover next! Thank you for listening.