Showing posts with label Alan Dean Foster. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Alan Dean Foster. Show all posts

Thursday, October 26, 2023

Wild, Wild Podcast Season 6: Episode 2 - Luana, the Girl Tarzan (Luana la figlia delle foresta vergine, 1968)


Stop us if you've heard this one before: a plane crashes in the jungle killing the adults onboard and leaving a solitary three-year-old girl to fend for herself. Communing with the animals, she grows into a beautiful young woman who the local tribes worship and fear as a goddess. Yes, if you asked AI to write you a jungle girl movie, it wouldn't be all that different from the plot of Luana, but here on the Wild, Wild Podcast we love it, and her, anyway!

You can learn more about the star of the film, Mei-Chen, and see plenty of pictures, over on Pulp International. You can also check out the amazing Luana comic strips and Frank Frazetta artwork HERE. And of course, if you want to watch Luana, it's available on YouTube.

We would love to hear from you if you have any favorite Jungle Girl films, or if you ever got lost in the jungle yourself and ended up befriending the animals or becoming a god to a local tribe. You can contact us on Twitter and Instagram or by email at wildwildpodcast@gmail.com. Please also remember to rate and review us on your podcast platform of choice!

Tuesday, November 17, 2009

LUANA (1968) and its novelization


A couple of years ago I bought a bootleg copy of the then hard to find Italian made jungle girl film LUANA. I had hopes that it would be either a rough gem of hidden skill or, if that was too much, a sleazy soft-core romp of steamy nudity with fur loin cloths. It turned out to be neither, sad to say. Its a poorly made outdoor epic shot on obvious indoor sets with very little in the way of sleazy fun or even interest outside of the basic idea. Not that the idea for the story was original at all but the 'child lost in the wilderness/raised by animals' concept is inherently fascinating on many levels so it takes a real effort to screw it up. That effort was made with LUANA and in a certain light that makes it unique. Not adult enough to be dirty, not well written enough to be fun it still manages to be a mostly painless 85 minutes or so even if it would have been greatly enhanced by the Mystery Science Theater crew.

A while after finally seeing the movie I made a shocking discovery- science fiction author Alan Dean Foster had written a novelization for LUANA. Holy crap! I found a copy for sale and was stunned by what I held in my hands. How had this come to be? Foster was kind of the king of science fiction film novelizations for years but how did he end up handling this small, obscure production? There was nothing for it but to ask! So I looked up Mr. Foster on the old inter-tubes and there was his contact info - right on his website. He turned out to be a very nice fellow and responded to my questions quickly and with great humor. Sadly the later emails I exchanged with him were lost when my old computer crashed but I still have our first communications. Here's how I broached the subject.....

Hello Mr. Foster,
As you might surmise, I am a fan of your work. I first became aware of your name from many science fiction film novelizations in my youth but then quickly branched out into the Pip & Flinx novels and the Spellsinger series with my favorite still being 'The Man Who Used the Universe'.

I recently became interested in tracking down a copy of the very obscure film LUANA. For months all I could locate was the amazing poster art done by Frank Frazetta but I finally was able to get a copy sourced from the only video release of the film in the world that I'm aware of (from Venezuela, of all places). Then one bit of good luck followed another and I stumbled across a copy of your novelization of the film. Until I spotted it on the table of a used book dealer I had no idea this existed. I know from your web-site that this book was published in 1974 coinciding with the small scale US release of the film. The movie was actually shot in 1968 and released in most of the world then with the US getting it a bit too late to really make much of an impression- if it really could have ever done so anyway!

I am curious about what you remember of this film and your involvement with it. I realize the passing of years and the slightness of the film are working against me but I'm hoping you have some information. Did you ever see the film? Were you given a shooting script to work from? Were you aware of the film's pedigree i.e. the comic strip its based on? Any information at all would be welcome.

I must confess that I still haven't read the novelization. I haven't even pulled it from its plastic wrap! Often the anticipation of a thing can be as good or better than its realization but I hope that's not the case here. With your name on the cover I'm sure there are at least some points of interest within.

Thank you very much for reading this email. I look forward to learning what you remember about this long ago project.

Sincerely,

Rod Barnett


His reply came in less than a day.

Hi Rod;
There was no shooting script of the film available. I did the novelization after watching it...in Italian! I didn't know it was based on a comic strip.
The funniest story involves Disney. After reading the book, they wanted to buy the film rights...they didn't realize it was a novelization of an existing film.
Thanks for the kind words regarding my work.
Alan F


As I've said, we wrote back and forth a few more times and I particularly liked his comments on his novel 'The Man Who Used the Universe' but those missives are gone now. I'll leave speculation on the Disney idea to others but it does amuse me. Foster did some serious creating to fill the book's pages with no English language translation to work from. Of course, the film is pretty simply plotted so it wouldn't have been too hard to follow the tale - but still! One of the things we discussed included the fact that film was made in 1968 and released then in most places around the world but didn't get picked up for the US until 1974 which is when his novelization was written and published. He was unaware if its age at the time but wasn't surprised. LUANA was his very first job as a film novelizer and seems to have pointed the way for his later career in the field.

Just for the record - the book was very good. Foster made up his own story to go along with the film he watched and, to put it clearly, his is the better tale by far. But if you're curious the film can now be had pretty cheaply on DVD straight from Amazon and the book isn't too hard to find either.



Thursday, April 09, 2009

Alan Dean Foster's novelization of THE THING (1982)

I occasionally like to read the novelization of a film that I love. Usually I do this to see what differences there might be from book to film because I know that the writer of the books are almost always working with a very early version of the script. Many changes are often made in production that simply cannot be reflected in the novelization so they provide a window into the progression of the story from concept to script to screen. In the case of THE THING I’ve watched the Carpenter film more times than I can count and have always been fascinated with the story, so a chance to examine the Alan Dean Foster (who else?) book was something I couldn’t resist.

Here are my quick notes on the book’s divergences from the finished film. Spoilers are massive throughout, as you might expect, but if you haven’t seen THE THING you should stop everything right now and check it out. Classic modern horror doesn’t get any better.

There are almost no descriptors about any of the character’s races or much in the way of physical attributes in the book. Station head Garry is described as an old Army man and Norris’ heart trouble is mentioned but his medical condition was handled well visually in the film. I’m most surprised by the lack of description of the cast. I wonder if Foster had any production photos at all. The few small details he gives, such as Palmer having long straight blond hair, are very off and can’t refer to anyone in the cast. Foster seems to have been working from a pretty early script draft as the film’s character Windows is named Sanders in the book.

Another indicator of an early draft is in the opening sequence when the Norwegian helicopter lands at Outpost #31. In the film it lands, and then a dropped grenade destroys it. In the book the chopper crashes and explodes. I bet it was a lot less dangerous and less expensive to do it the way Carpenter filmed this sequence.


The first significant alteration in the narrative I know so well comes at about the halfway mark. The book pretty much follows the film as done for the bulk of the story until we get to the point when Blair freaks out. Everything is the same as the film except that he has not killed the dogs at the time he disabled the chopper and snow cat. After they lock the subdued Blair in the outdoor shed it is discovered that the remaining three dogs have escaped the pen and run off into the storm. MacReady, Childs and Bennings take a couple of snowmobiles and set off in pursuit. When they catch up to the two surviving animals they find that the third has been eaten to keep the Thing going in its attempt to reach the coast. As they confront the changed dogs we have the appearance of the huge, multi-headed beast that shows up in the film at the very end. Bennings is killed by the Thing while Childs and Mac burn it to death and head back to camp. This is the first time anyone gets a really good look at the creature metamorphosing and it reads very well. I can understand why a rewrite might have shifted this set piece to the final act instead of the middle of the tale.

Throughout the book we are given hints of something odd going on with missing parts all over camp. Palmer can’t find a missing magneto to work on the chopper, Nauls loses a food processor and other bits & pieces can’t be found. This, of course, is later revealed to be stuff stolen by Blair to build his never finished transport to civilization. This is a nice bit of foreshadowing that I wish had been kept in the film. Another small detail in the book involves Palmer and Childs’ semi-secret pot garden in a storeroom. It’s a later point of entrance for the Thing into the camp. This is also where the book shows us the fate of Fuchs. In the film he just disappears with no explanation but here he is found dead and pinned to the garden door with an axe. I would like to know if this stuff was shot.

As we approach the ending things get changed around a lot. When Mac breaks back into the camp and is holding everyone else off with the threat of blowing the place up it is identical to the film. But when the Norris creature Things-out in response to defibrillation it doesn’t bite off Doc Copper’s arms! This leaves him very much alive for the blood test scene. And the brilliant head transformation into a spider-thing isn’t in the book either pointing to a probable FX crew addition to the proceedings that might not have been in the script at all. Smart move regardless as that effect has always been one the movie’s signature moments.


After Mac comes up with the blood test its Copper that is tested first instead of Sander/Windows. Copper is clean and he picks up a flame weapon so that when Palmer’s blood reacts violently it’s the poor doctor that gets attacked and bitten by the Thing. Once the Palmer-thing is destroyed the scene plays out as on film minus the F word addition to Garry’s line about wanting off the couch. This leaves Mac, Childs, Sanders/Windows, Garry and Nauls as the men left at this point.


The same three men as in the film go out to test Blair's blood and find him gone and discover his underground workspace. After destroying the half finished transport they get separated in the storm going back to the main camp and Childs goes missing. The plan Mac comes up with is to lure the Thing into the camp where they have booby traps waiting. By making the only warm locations where they wait prepared, they hope to trap it and burn it. In another bit I wish had been kept for the film Mac preps cyanide capsules for everyone just in case.

The creature uses the camp's speaker/intercom system cranked up as loud as possible to hide the sound of its approach to the men. As the Thing begins its final attack it is Sanders that gets it first from long talons ripping trough a door, although he seems to bite down on his cyanide capsule before being hauled away. Nauls, Mac and Garry crouch in the generator room and wait for the creature to enter through the only door. They have rigged the area with wires to try electrocuting the Thing in an obvious replay of the same scene in the 1951 film. It enters as they hope for but skewers Garry who dies as Mac throws the switch and fries him and the Thing. This, of course, doesn’t kill the monster. Mac escapes out an emergency window and Nauls becomes trapped in a bathroom stall where he kills himself with a wood splinter rather than let the Thing take him.

Mac fires up a snow tractor and begins demolishing the camp in an attempt to find the creature and blow it away with his clutch of dynamite. The monster pushes up through the tractor's engine; Mac scrambles onto the building's now very shaky roof and tosses a bundle of lit dynamite toward the monster and the hydrogen tanks it’s squelching over. Boom! Dead Thing. The book ends with the reappearance of a severely frostbitten Childs and plays just as the film does with one addition. Mac sets up a magnetic chess set to teach Childs to play as they wait in the cold to die.