Thursday, November 30, 2023

The Bloody Pit #185 - TEN LITTLE INDIANS (1965)

Author Troy Howarth returns to the show to talk about the second feature film of Agatha Christie’s TEN LITTLE INDIANS (1965). We compare it to the superior 1945 version and a couple of later attempts to bring this sturdy tale to the big screen. Both of us try not to spoil the story for those who have yet to experience the fun, but a few of the surprises do slip into the conversation.

We discuss the novel and its original title as well as the changes Christie made to her bestselling story when she adapted it for the stage. This beautifully photographed black and white movie is a stylish and well-cast progenitor of the slasher horror genre in which the mysterious killer murders his victims in darkly humorous ways, whittling the cast down for our entertainment. The cast is fascinating and we dig into the careers of several of them touching on their high and low points. Troy’s appreciation of Dennis Price surfaces with me teasing him about a possible future writing project. Fingers crossed! I point to a couple of small things that stand out as ill-fitting or overlong but we both think highly of this strong revisioning of this always intriguing tale. I’m just not sure I’m ready for the Frank Stallone version.

If you have a favorite screen adaptation of this story let us know at thebloodypit@gmail.com – we’ll be glad to hear from you. Thank you for listening and we’ll be back soon.


Thursday, November 23, 2023

The Greatest Thanksgiving Image of All Time!

We desperately need the film that this image promises! Get on it Hollywood!

Tuesday, November 21, 2023

Thanksgiving Comic Book Covers









Thanksgiving themed covers are not as prevalent as other Holidays but they do turn up occasionally.



 

Saturday, November 18, 2023

What I Watched in October 2023


Easily the most impressive new horror film I saw in October was WHEN EVIL LURKS (2023) from Argentina. A decidedly different take on the idea of possession it goes in directions both sledgehammer violent and subtly nuanced while creating a different way of thinking about the concept from nearly every angle.

Starting in rural Argentina we are slowly introduced to the evidence of some possibly supernatural event involving the death of a visitor to the area. The film’s slow build of information felt perfect as it puts us in the position of an outsider looking in and having to put together the pieces before things are presented in an unambiguous fashion. The characters refer to these disturbing events as something that is not unknown but more common in heavily populated areas. Adding to the mystery the film’s dialog points toward the possible dystopian/apocalyptic nature of this situation and the story plays out in a way that leaves that open. The terminology used to describe the victims of these ‘possessions’ is very different from the standard but exactly the kind of identifiers that people with limited means and education would use. Referring to the victims as rotten or ‘the rotten’ both prolongs the question of what is happening and is an excellent descriptor of the effect that this ‘demon possession’ has on the individuals affected by it.

As the story moves from rural to urban we follow the rising desperation of the main character as he attempts to make people believe him and then his utter despair as he realizes that his task might be impossible. When he begins to understand that it is his fears that have brought about the worst imagined consequences the film moves into some of the darkest material I’ve seen in a horror tale in years. The film leaves the ultimate answer about what is happening a question with many possible answers but the dark nature of the actions of the affected are undeniably awful. I found the setting of the third act in an abandoned children's school to be incredibly effective and without a doubt one of the most satisfyingly dark endings of a horror film I've seen in a long time. There are depths to this film that many of us will be discussing for years to come.

Needless to say, I recommend the film.


The List  

IT LIVES INSIDE (2023) – 6 (interesting Hindu demon tale)

RUN RABBIT RUN (2023) – 7 (Australian psychological horror – family ghosts resurface)

SOCIETY LAWYER (1939) – 7 (fast and sharp crime story with Walter Pidgeon)

SHADOW OF DEATH (1969) – 7 (twisty Spanish murder tale)

SCREAM OF THE BLIND DEAD (2021) – 3 (dull 40 minutes of love for the original film)

ANNABELLE (2014) – 7 (well made with one outstanding scare that really got me)

SPECTERS (a.k.a. Spettri) (1987) – 5 (spooky events around an archeological dig – barely hangs together)

YOU’RE NEXT (2011) – 8 (rewatch)

THE INFERNO (1979) -7 (remake of Jigoku (1960) – this is a little too long but very good)

SLAUGHTERHOUSE ROCK (1987) – 3 (Toni Basil is the only bright spot)

A HAUNTING IN VENICE (2023) – 8

LONDON BY NIGHT (1937) – 6 (interesting murder mystery with one awful supporting performance)

THE ONES YOU DIDN’T BURN (2022) – 6 (low-key slow-burn tale of modern witches)

THE INCUBUS (1982) – 7 (fascinating if clunky supernatural horror – great cast)

KINGDOM OF THE SPIDERS (1977) – 6 (rewatch)

FRIGHT NIGHT (1985) – 9 (rewatch in Blu)

SOMETHING WICKED THIS WAY COMES (1983) – 6 (rewatch on Blu)

WEREWOLF BY NIGHT (2022) – 8 (rewatch)

EXORCIST: BELIEVER (2023) – 7

FRIDAY THE 13TH VII – THE NEW BLOOD (1988) – 7 (rewatch on Blu)

V/H/S/85 (2023) – 7 (well done anthology entry)

MIDNIGHT MAN (2013) – 6 (interesting low budget Irish ghost tale)

ANNABELLE: CREATION (2017) – 7 (effective, creepy evil doll origin tale)

FRANKENSTEIN (1931) – 8 (rewatch on Blu)

INSECT (a.k.a. BLUE MONKEY) (1987) – 6 (a better than I expected giant bug film)

PRINCE OF DARKNESS (1987) – 8 (rewatch on Blu)

LUANA, THE GIRL TARZAN (1968) – 6 (rewatch)

THE KINDRED (1987) – 7 (well done mad scientist/monster film)

A FIELD IN ENGLAND (2013) – 7 (fascinating period horror)

THE EVIL OF FRANKENSTEIN (1964) – 7 (rewatch on Blu) (it falters in the last act but until then..)

THE FREAKMAKER (1974) – 7 (solid mad scientist crossed with FREAKS story - great cast)

BROOKLYN 45 (2023) – 8 (excellent WWII ghost tale)

STOP ME BEFORE I KILL (1960) – 7 (well done Val Guest directed thriller)

HALLOWEEN III: SEASON OF THE WITCH (1982) – 8 (rewatch on Blu)

THE RAVEN (1935) – 8 (rewatch on Blu)

TERROR OUT OF THE SKY (1978) – 5 (killer bee TV movie – sequel to The Savage Bees)

THE HAUNTED PALACE (1963) – 8 (rewatch on Blu)

WHEN EVIL LURKS (2023) – 9 (excellent demon possession tale from Argentina)

THE HEARSE (1980) – 6 (rewatch)

KILLERS OF THE FLOWER MOON (2023) – 9

PHASE IV (1974) – 7 (rewatch on Blu)

ANNABELLE COMES HOME (2019) – 7 (becomes a suburban haunted house story)

THE GHOST OF FRANKENSTEIN (1942) – 7 (rewatch on Blu)

HALLOWEEN (1978) – 10 (rewatch on Blu)

THE MONSTER WALKS (1932) – 5 (clunky per-code old dark house thriller)

HALLOWEEN II (1981) – 7 (rewatch of the TV version)

THE DEVIL’S WEDDING NIGHT (1973) – 7 (rewatch)


 

Thursday, November 16, 2023

Universal 1940's Mummy Films Poster Art
















I know that the 40's films are not as brilliant as the 1932 Karloff film but I love these fun B-movies. And the poster artwork for them is amazing! 

 

Sunday, November 12, 2023

The Bloody Pit #184 - PHASE IV (1974)

Author Randy Fox returns to the show so that we can continue our series on 1970’s Science Fiction films! This time we look at the fascinating directorial debut of graphic designer Saul Bass, PHASE IV (1974). The film was a financial failure at the time of release but its status as a cult film has grown slowly over the decades. 

We look at the many cinematic influences the film’s story draws from including THE NAKED JUNGLE (1954), THE ANROMEDA STRAIN (1971) and 2001: A SPACE ODESSEY (1968). We marvel over the ant photography that allows the film to so clearly show us the world of these newly altered insects traveling into their hives and, at times, seemingly into their minds. We discuss the small cast even as I question why they bothered to give the characters proper names at all. Given Saul Bass’ background as a visual artist it is no surprise that the film produces a dozen or more unforgettable images and we try to point out as many of them as possible. The choice to use a voiceover is put to the test with Randy’s dreaded ‘professor with a pointer’ serving as our classic example of going too far! We dig into the ways the human living spaces are presented in comparison to those of the ants and how a break in that alignment shows a specific communication change in the story. Of course, we occasionally veer off topic as things point us toward other subjects but I’m happy to say we always find our way back to the film under the magnifying glass. 

The excellent Dissolve article we reference in the show can be found HERE and is well worth a read! 

Do you have thoughts about PHASE IV or other films that stuck with you even though you weren’t sure if you liked them? If so, thebloodypit@gmail.com is the address to send those comments. Thank you for listening!