I have enjoyed reading film novelizations since I was a wee
lad. I have great memories of reading the STAR WARS and ALIEN novelizations
long before I got to see the films and I've always thought that having those
stories already present in my head when I sat down for my first viewing added
to the experience. Usually though I have ended up reading the novelization well
after seeing the film the book was based upon. There are a number of reasons
for doing this. In my opinion the best reason is to see what changes were made
to the finished film that stayed in the novel. These can be things as small as
extra snatches of dialog or as big as entire sequences that didn't get filmed
for various reasons. I always find the books interesting and quick reads even
if they offer little in the way of top level writing or really anything more
than simple, effective prose. But simple and effective prose is all these books
require so when I read one of them I know what to expect.
Until now the only unifying trait tying all the
novelizations I have read together would be that I actually liked the film
being transmogrified into a book. That might seem like a given but I have
finally broken that streak by reading a book based on a film I consider very,
very bad. Indeed, I find INVASION USA (1984) so bad I entered it into our
annual Turkey Night of Bad Cinema recently to introduce others to its
incredible ridiculousness. So, why read the novelization of a terrible 80s
action film starring renowned plank of wood Chuck Norris?
This blog post by Joe Kenney over on GloriousTrash made it necessary.
Reading about the real identity of author Jason Frost and
the fact that the book was waaaayyyy better than the movie made this a must
find. Lucky for me, my beloved girlfriend took note of my online babble about
this twenty-eight year old bit of Men's Adventure Trash and gifted me with a
yellowing copy for my birthday. Ain't love grand?
So, now that I've read INVASION USA what do I think? Its a
blast! Exactly as Mr. Kenney noted this version of the story actually makes
sense. In the film Norris' blank-eyed hero Hunter seems to just repeatedly,
magically appear where ever villain Rostov's
terrorists are causing havoc. Hunter then mows the bad guys down with his
mini-submachine guns and then fades back into the night. Always the night. It
is this repeated pattern of superhuman ability to locate the bad guys followed
by near comic slaughter that makes the film so damned funny. But in the novel
we see that Hunter is smartly tracking reporters that are being tipped off by
the terrorists to increase the amount of news coverage each event receives. See
how easy that was to fix? Why is that not in the movie?
In the film
Rostov's plan to destabilize
the
United States
seems poorly thought out and pathetically executed but in the novel things are
much more interesting. We're told that several teams of terrorists have been
sent to major cities to insight race and ethnic riots around the country. This
is much more impressive than a group of two dozen morons running around
Miami shopping malls
shooting people randomly at Christmas time. This makes each action scene have
some weight as does the author's repeated detailing of some of the civilian
victims of the various attacks. Its often harsh to learn just enough about a
couple of characters to sympathize with them only to then have them cruelly
gunned down by the marauding terrorists.
Also, the antagonism between Hunter and Rostov is explained very well with a nightmare
flashback detailing the opportunity Hunter had to kill the dastardly fellow
several years before. This information makes Hunter's repeated use of the
phrase 'time to die' actually mean something in the narrative. It also makes Rostov's blind hatred for
Hunter clear and understandable which is far beyond what the film seems capable
of.
Of course, the real question is if this material was in the
original script and then discarded in the shooting or editing of the finished
product? Or was all the novel's solid meat on the film's sagging bones crafted
out of the mind of 'Jason Frost'? We may never know without an interview with
Raymond Obstfeld focused on his adventure fiction work in the 1980s but I would
love to find out. Regardless, it has been quite a surprise to discover that
someone could (or would bother to) turn a crappy 80s action
Turkey into an
exciting, well done Men's Adventure story on the printed page. Maybe when I
next get the urge to read an Executioner or Destroyer novel in the future I
could instead locate the novelization of RAMBO III and hope for the best. Or
not.