Have a safe and happy Halloween!
Friday, October 31, 2014
Thursday, October 30, 2014
Moon Monster - Animated Horror Fan Club Spot (Comic Book Ad, 1970)
Moon Monster - Animated Horror Fan Club Spot (Comic Book Ad, 1970) from Jason Willis on Vimeo.
Each year animator Jason Willis puts together a Halloween project in which he takes neat image or ad from his Monster Kid childhood and brings it to life. This year's is fantastic and funny to boot! Check this out- it'll put a smile on your face.
Each year animator Jason Willis puts together a Halloween project in which he takes neat image or ad from his Monster Kid childhood and brings it to life. This year's is fantastic and funny to boot! Check this out- it'll put a smile on your face.
Wednesday, October 29, 2014
THE LAST HORROR FILM (1982)
The Last Horror Film relates the sad tale of Vinny
Durand (Joe Spinell). A New York cab driver, Vinny
has dreams of becoming a Hollywood film
director but as the film begins he lives at home with his mother (Spinell's
real-life mom). Obsessed with horror film actress Jana Bates (Caroline Munro),
he's convinced that if he can just speak to her she will recognize his genius
and be thrilled to star in his movie. He is, of course, delusional — and if
there is any doubt seeing his bedroom covered in photos of Ms. Bates from floor
to ceiling will put them to rest. Determined to overcome all obstacles he loads
up his 16mm camera and sets off to the annual Cannes Film Festival to somehow
meet with his beloved actress.
Once he's in France Vinny begins darting around Cannes , camera on
shoulder, trying any way he can to get in front of Jana and attract her
attention. The actress is being feted about town and spoken of as 'in the
running' for awards for her roles in a string of horror movies — my favorite
unbelievable element of the film. At the same time someone starts killing
movie-makers at the festival... all of whom are connected to Vinny's favorite
actress in some way. Is the clearly unstable Vinny doing the slicing and
dicing? Or is there something else going on? And who is sending notes to Jana and
her filmmaker boyfriend (Judd Hamilton, Munro's actual spouse) stating that
they have made their "last horror movie"? Is it Vinny? Someone with a
16mm camera certainly seems to be able to catch Jana's reaction to the
discovery of her dead ex-husband on film just before the body mysteriously
disappears.
Does our erstwhile obsessive film fan have more than a
single screw loose or is he just a determined man misunderstood by less
discerning people trying to hold him back? Actually, that's a silly question.
Vinny is obviously nuts! Unable to hold his shit together long enough to watch
a gore film, or control his lustful urges while a nude woman dances in a club,
he's the classic repressed sicko with no good way of expressing his feelings.
The film tries hard to slather a sense of social commentary over these goings
on with a reoccurring voice-over that lets us partially inside Vinny's mind,
but it doesn't work very well. Even less effective is the repeated, intrusive
radio news broadcasts relaying violent real-life incidents from the year the
film was made. The filmmakers were trying (I guess) to underscore the harsh,
terrible reality of the world that makes horror movies such a tame thing in
comparison, but it just comes off as pointless. I agree with what I think the
film is saying with these inserted news stories but it would take a better
movie to effectively communicate the idea without seeming inane.
There comes a point while watching a movie when the viewer
realizes that they are watching a bad 'un. No matter when this moment comes
it's immediately followed by a conscious decision to either keep watching or to
move on to some other, less crappy thing in life. I almost always opt for
sticking through to the bitter end just to see if there is anything of note in
the disaster onscreen. Often this can be a fool's game and a real waste of
time, but on occasion there are benefits to my drive to complete whatever film I've
started. In the case of The Last Horror Film there are a number of
reasons I'm glad I stayed until the end credits — but the script is not one of
them. The reasons to soldier on are the two stars and the one stroke of
brilliance the filmmakers mustered up: shooting the entire thin tale on
location during the 1981 Cannes Film Festival. The movie could be a whole lot
less good and still be worth watching simply to see the amazing sights of Cannes in full movie
spaz-drag. I found myself pausing and rewinding several times to get a better
look at posters, theater marquees and strange advertising gimmicks that litter
the French landscape. My favorite is the hotel entrance made up with the
artwork for the Bond film For Your Eyes Only that places the doorway
between a pair of shapely female legs. Mon dieu!
Labels:
80s horror movies,
exploitation cinema,
slashers,
weird movies
Monday, October 27, 2014
Sunday, October 26, 2014
Brief Thoughts- THE AMAZING TRANSPARENT MAN (1960)
Director Edgar Ulmer is responsible for one of my favorite movies of
all time –THE BLACK CAT (1934) – and scattered around his list of credits you
will find several other excellent pictures well worth your attention. His film
noir DETOUR (1945) is a classic; the
1944 BLUEBEARD is fascinating; THE MAN FROM PLANET X (1951) is wonderful; and MURDER
IS MY BEAT (1955) is quite entertaining. Sadly, for me, THE AMAZING TRANSPARENT MAN (1960)
is not one of Ulmer's works I can recommend. Spurred on by a commenter to this
blog and the fact that TCM recently ran the film I decided to revisit the movie
the other night. My memories were that it wasn’t very good and I have to
report that I still feel the same way.
The movie is barely feature length clocking in at 58 minutes
but DAMN- you feel each and every one of those increments of sixty seconds
crawl by. The film is best described as a combination of film noir crime
elements and mad scientist tropes but that makes it sound much more interesting
that it is. Hell - just saying that a scientist creates an invisibility ray
that is used to make a professional safe-cracker's job easier makes the film sound
like a surefire blast but the resulting movie is just dull. Deadly dull! Tedious.
Monotonous. Lifeless even. THE AMAZING TRANSPARENT MAN is the filmic equivalent
of watching paint dry or insects slowly die as the weather gets cold. I need
never see this sleep inducing cinematic bog again. Ugh!
Labels:
60s cinema,
bad movies,
Crime Movies,
mad scientists,
poster art,
science fiction
Saturday, October 25, 2014
The Fantastic Films of Vincent Price #3 - The Invisible Man Returns!
My old buddy Larry Underwood is the reigning Horror Host of Nashville and has been doing a web series covering each of the films of Vincent Price. Here he covers one of the most overlooked of his early horror movies and does a fine job summing up its strengths and weaknesses. Its not my favorite of the Invisible Man sequels but its better than its reputation.
Labels:
horror hosts,
Universal Monsters,
Vincent Price,
youtube
Thursday, October 23, 2014
Wednesday, October 22, 2014
Book to Film - THE MANITOU (1978)
I can't explain why I have such a strange fascination with
the 1978 film THE MANITOU. I can't claim it's a very good movie or that it has a
very impressive story or is packed with creepy atmosphere or is well cast. OK- that last complaint
isn't completely true. The only bit of casting that really seems off is TonyCurtis as phony psychic and all around good guy Harry Erskine. Erskine is
supposed to be in his early thirties and at the time Curtis was actually in his
late fifties so when the dialog between him and co-star Susan Strasberg strays
too close to romantic territory the story seems a little odd. Luckily the story
is so crazy there isn't much time for that kind of thing.
For years I have wanted to read the source novel of the same
title by Graham Masterson but only got around to it this October. I was pleased
with the book and found it (my first Masterson novel) to be a fun, freaky
horror tale. Adding to my enjoyment was the fact that the film stuck really
close to the novel. Indeed, I was surprised by how close to the book the film
had stayed. There are a few changes -location, specific events, etc.- but the
movie is about 80% straight from the page. This is a rarity and I must say that
in this case it was a refreshing thing to discover, as my familiarity with the
adaptation made the book an even more visual read. The movie takes entire
sections of the book and slaps them right up onto the screen- even when that
might not have been the best choice to have made.
The plot of the film is simple, up to a point - Karen (Susan Strasberg) is suffering from a
reoccurring nightmare and consults psychic Harry (Curtis). She believes her
trouble is related to a tumor growing on her neck and enters a private hospital
to have it removed. After a series of X-rays the doctors begin to think
the tumor is a living creature - possible a vestigial fetus growing inside
the swelling. Harry becomes concerned and researches Karen's dream which points
to a Native American legend about a medicine man. The operation to remove the
fetus/tumor fails when it seems that the growth has interlocked its nervous
system with Karen's and then strange things start happening around the
hospital. It appears that the tumorous growth is an Indian medicine man named Misquamacus
who is reincarnating himself! The time travelling magic user feels under attack
as a result of the X-rays used by the doctors to ascertain its nature and the
radiation is starting to stunt and deform the thing's development. Misquamacus is
returning to exact his revenge on white men who invaded North
America and exterminated its native peoples. Harry locates another
Native American shaman named Singing Rock (Michael Ansara) who is hired to help
fight the reincarnating medicine man, but the kind of spirits he can summon for
battle may be too weak to match his opponent's abilities.
Now- if that synopsis sounds crazed you know what you are in
for and I wash my hands of
responsibility if you still watch the film. Understand that I like the movie
but I don't expect you to be anything more than bemused. The ending is
completely insane and shows that the book's monster heavy ending needed to be
re-imagined for the screen - but not in this way. On the other hand, I can
easily recommend the Masterson novel as a good read and well worth your time if
you enjoy horror fiction and I think so highly of it that I look forward to
tracking down the sequel! I wonder if Misquamacus actually returns or its
another pissed off medicine man.
One day I need to write a bit about the film's director
William Girdler. He had in interesting career.
Labels:
70s horror,
monsters,
novels,
weird movies,
what I read,
William Girdler
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)