Ahh, the films of Summer! I do enjoy getting in out of the
heat to munch popcorn and bask in the glow of a big action film and therefore
MISSION IMPOSSIBLE: ROGUE NATION got my money. I was not a fan of the first two
installments of this film series but the last three have been pretty clever spy
thrillers with this one keeping the batting average moving in the right
direction. I was a little disappointed that there were a couple of flatly
unbelievable moments - Cruise being flung into the plane when the door finally
opens - but the tone and pace were spot on with nice turns from all involved.
It's nice to have Alec Baldwin aboard as the government's jerk in residence
with his future in the next film being a fun reversal. As usual with these
kinds of movies I enjoy the less explosive action sequences the most and the
motorcycle/car chase present here is fantastic. I think that Cruise and the
director's previous film JACK REACHER was much better but I'm glad to see the
pair working together well in a film of larger budget. Sharp, fast and clever
are the kinds of words that should be used when describing this kind of movie
and this team has a handle on those things.
I have come to terms with the fact that there may never be a
good film made from the Fantastic Four comic book characters. There have been
three separate attempts spread over four films trying to bring this team to the
big screen and by pure crappy luck they have gotten the worst of it each time.
This time should have been the one that finally got things right but whether
because of studio micromanaging or creative incompetence (reports vary) we now
have another massive failure. It's a crying shame. There are flashes of a
damned good idea here and there throughout this film that gave me the
occasional hope that the movie would straighten out and begin to pull itself
together but it never happens. The best example for me is when the team plus
Victor Von Doom finally succeed in travelling to the Negative Zone - uh, I mean
Planet Zero (?). This is a well done sequence and the visualization of the
alien world is remarkable. But then the film stops dead so that the group can
climb down a cliff to look at cracks in the ground and boredom strikes. In
fact, boredom is this film's default setting! The pacing is awful throughout
the running time with the story seeming to just get moving before hitting a
wall repeatedly. I don't mind reimaging the classic characters but don't bore
me! How in the Hell do you make this film and manage to BORE me? Damn!
To be honest, there are some good scenes that work to keep the film from being a complete flush and the actors do a very good job of selling what they are given but it ends up not mattering. This is a total mess. The only hope is that 20th Century Fox lets Marvel have these characters back and in a few years- after the stink has dissipated - yet another attempt can be made. This just shouldn't be that hard.
To be honest, there are some good scenes that work to keep the film from being a complete flush and the actors do a very good job of selling what they are given but it ends up not mattering. This is a total mess. The only hope is that 20th Century Fox lets Marvel have these characters back and in a few years- after the stink has dissipated - yet another attempt can be made. This just shouldn't be that hard.
I'd love to get into a deeper discussion about
writer/director/actor Joel Edgerton's well made thriller THE GIFT but I don't
want to take any of the surprises away from potential viewers. This a film that
could have easily been just another of the 'yuppies in peril' stories that
Hollywood pumped out in 1990's like the whole town was working under a court
order but Edgerton has constructed a clever twist or two. Indeed, he might even
have pulled off the near impossible quadruple twist ending if my count is
accurate. Just settle in and let Edgerton and his fine cast of talented actors
spin this yarn and suck you in. Good stuff!
And now for the best surprise of the month. I'm a fan of the
1960's TV series The Man From UNCLE but I came to the show only in recent
years. I never caught it in reruns as a kid so I have little familiarity with
it as a nostalgic touchstone and only see it as a pretty damned good spy
adventure. I had moderate expectations of this new film adaptation of the
series because I have enjoyed the director's previous films and liked what I
saw of the casting. When I learned that they were making it a 1960's period
piece I became more interested and then the first trailer sealed the deal. Wow!
Let me say that I'm aware that the film hasn't done very
well financially and I think that is a damned shame as THE MAN FROM U.N.C.L.E. is
one of my favorite movies of the year so far! This is a well written, well
paced Cold War thriller that feels like a movie made in 1963 without drawing
ostentatious attention to the ways that it does so. The sets, costumes, cars,
locations and even the hairstyles are period appropriate in ways that make it
seem as if the filmmakers studied the first three Bond films and refused to use
anything that couldn't be spotted in them. To make things even more impressive
the film also gets the characters and their attitudes accurate to the period.
This is something that is often glossed over in the rare instances when a
modern movie is set in the past as, more often than not, the characters are more
modern in their mindsets and mores than they should be. Not here. These are
Cold War warriors and their conflicts are real as are their personality quirks
which also ring true to the time period. I know this attention to detail must
have been a driving concern for the creators and I applaud them for it but it
is this firm refusal to break period that probably made it fall flat for
younger audiences. As I said to a friend who also admires the movie, "It
might not please the under thirty crowd. It only has one explosion! What would Michael Bay think?" And did I forget to mention the excellent score? Wow! This is a great spy
thriller and I hope they somehow find a way to keep this creative team together
and make a sequel. This is the kind of Summer movie I love!
The List
THE THREAT (1949)- 7 (solid
little crime thriller)
THE ATTICUS INSTITUTE
(2015)- 7 (supernatural thriller)
ELEVATOR TO THE GALLOWS (1958)-
8 (French crime thriller)
STEEL DAWN (1987)- 6 (not
bad little post-apocalypse film)
THE GUEST (2014) - 8 (very
well done action/suspense film)
CROSS COUNTRY CRUISE (1934)-
6 (fun Pre-Code road trip/romance/drama)
BIRDMAN (2014)- 9 (amazing
piece of magical realism)
BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT
(1956)- 7 (Lang's twisty murder tale)
FANTASTIC FOUR (2015) - 3
(missed again)
BARQUERO (1970)- 7 (western
with Lee Van Cleef, Warren Oates, Forrest Tucker and Mariette Hartley!)
ROTTWEILER (2004)- 4
PLANETA BUR (1962)- 8 (fascinating
Russian SF)
YOU'RE NEXT (2011)- 8
(rewatch)
THE QUILLER MEMORANDUM
(1966)- 9 (excellent realistic spy adventure)
THE MAZE RUNNER (2014)- 7
CREEP (2014)- 6 (interesting
two character horror film)
THE ISLAND OF DR. MOREAU
(1996)- 7 (rewatch)
THE DROP (2014)- 9
(excellent crime tale/character study)
LOCKE (2013)- 8 (brilliant
single character play with Tom Hardy)
THE GIFT (2015)- 8 (yuppies
in peril thriller but with a twist or two)
THE MAN FROM U.N.C.L.E.
(2015) - 9
INSIDE LLEWYN DAVIS (2013)-
7 (sad character study)
TAKE A HARD RIDE (1975)- 8
(rewatch)
PREDESTINATION (2014)- 9
(rewatch) (even better the second time)
THE PICTURE OF DORIAN GRAY
(1945)- 8
THE WITCH (1954) - 6 (pretty
good Mexican horror/revenge tale)
2 comments:
How many people under 30 do you know that don't have a problem watching a movie with story and character development instead of "plosions" every 30 seconds? I've been surprised at work because there were a couple of older guys ( about late 40's) who I stopped talking to about movies because Peckinpah's The Getaway is boring from one and I think both said Once Upon a Time in the West is boring for example. However, they think Adam Sandler and Transformers movies are good. On the other hand, there are two guys my age that have problem watching an older movie.
I guess it depends on whether the person actually likes movies or just wants something to distract them. Age isn't really the best way to break these kinds of attitudes down but it does give a good shorthand for short attention span and/or lack of desire to stretch expectations.
Post a Comment