data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a5c1b/a5c1b1a9b0c8f094b59009a7bbee82249ee9bda2" alt=""
So when I broke out QUANTUM and watched it at home I was shocked to find myself liking it more this time. With the movie shrunk down to my television screen I could actually see what the hell was happening in the action sequences which was a big help. The action is still far too edited-to-death for the film’s own good but being able to see briefly where cars are, who is shooting guns, where people are in relation to each other and what the setting of the fights looks like was a big change from seeing QOS on the big screen where everything was a blur of movement with no context. I’d pay good money to have a different editing team re-visit those sections of the movie. There’s a really good film in there somewhere that got lost in post-production.
I haven’t played with FOR YOUR EYES ONLY yet but I bet I will soon. I’m curious to see how well that film holds up 28 years later.
1 comment:
I liked QOS more than you apparently did on first viewing, but I, too, was thrown off by the flash-cut editing. The technique works like gangbusters during the opening car chase, IMO, but fails miserably during the Siena tunnel/rooftop chase. (The cuts are simply too extreme, in a much-too visually cluttered environment -- essentially ruining an otherwise beautifully shot set-piece.)
Fortunately, QOS is the one Bond flick that seems to actually improve with repeat viewings. And when watched back-to-back with CASINO ROYALE (2006), it forms part of a genuine 007 "epic".
Post a Comment