Last month saw the debut of the latest Bond film, SPECTRE
and I caught it opening weekend, like you do. I've been a big fan of the Daniel
Craig Bond era films feeling that the revision of the character was both
overdue and well done bringing needed gravitas and believability to a series
that often made feints at emotional complexity but rarely succeeded in
generating more than thrills. Not that there is anything wrong with thrills-
that is why we watch a spy movie/action film in the first place. But sometimes
the spectacle can be quite hollow without a sense of danger or the feeling of
connection to the events onscreen. The Craig films have shown a mature sense of
what loss can do to people and why regret is sometimes the standard state of
being for people in high risk jobs. These last four Bond movies seem to me the
most natural outgrowth of the original Connery films. Craig's Bond is now at
the point that Connery's version of the character should have been allowed to
reach by 1970. If the series' producers had had the vision to let Bond age and
grow older, shouldering his experiences like the barely repaired tool of the
state that he has become, these last two films would have been what that man
was destined to be - haunted, desperate and fearful that his path was too
crooked to be followed any longer.
All that may make it sound as if I didn't enjoy SPECTRE but
that is not true. This fourth Craig adventure is a solid if unremarkable Bond
film that has plenty of thrills and fantastic moments even if it ends up
seeming less than what it should have been. The biggest crime the film commits
is an almost criminal underuse of the great Christophe Waltz as the story's
central villain. He is given so little to do that it is painful to see an actor
of his talent squandered in such an underwritten role. As a mysterious man from
Bond's background he is far less menacing than he should be and I can't escape
the sense that the script needed another pass to give him more to do. Damned
shame. With a little luck he will return in the next film to be more of the bad
guy he was set up to be for the first hour of this film.
The rest of the movie is standard Bond heroics - and I
consider that a complement. There is a certain lack of cohesiveness to the
plotting that occasionally caused me to have to mentally backtrack for the
reason for each change of locale, but I'd rather the film move quickly than
overstate each point so I'm not going to complain too much. I actually found
the events back in London with M and his problems with the destruction of MI-6
to be more interesting at times than the globe hopping of the superspy. I can't
say that has ever been true of one of these movies before. Overall I like this
movie but it does not reach the heights of SKYFALL or CASINO ROYALE. This is a
good mid-range Bond film which means that Craig now has two solid wins, one
loss and what I will call a TKO. I hope he does one more of these and that the
script rises above the bare bones construct-a-threat level this one sinks to far too often.
The List
SAW III (2007)- 5
SEE NO EVIL 2 (2014)- 6
METAMORPHOSIS (1989)- 3 (pretty bad but kind of fun Euro-Trash horror)
BEYOND DARKNESS (1990)- 3 (pretty bad Euro-Horror)
LET US PREY (2014)- 7 (solid Scottish horror effort)
SPECTRE (2015)- 7
THE PROWLER (1951) - 8 (sharp film noir)
WITCHERY (1988)- 3 (Hasselhoff and Linda Blair in a Euro-horror mess)
MORTAL SIN (1977) - 6 (Spanish drama/soap opera)
VALERIE AND HER WEEK OF WONDERS (1971)- 8 (surreal arthouse horror)
BLOODSTONE: SUBSPECIES II (1993) -5
THE HOLLOW (2004)- 3
A DOG CALLED VENGEANCE (1979) - 6 (a.k.a. EL PERRO)
SAW IV (2007)- 5
THE DEADLY COMPANIONS (1961) - 6 (Peckinpah's first feature)
THE DARK HALF (1992)- 9 (rewatch)
ABAR, THE FIRST BLACK SUPERMAN (1977) - 2 (incredibly poor blaxploitation)
VICE SQUAD (1982) - 6 (rewatch)
TERMINATOR: GENYSIS (2015)- 7 (rewatch)
THE INVISIBLE MENACE (1938)- 6 (minor Karloff murder mystery)
MIAMI CONNECTION (1987) - 1 (hilariously bad 'action' film)
Rifftrax - THE SWORD & THE SORCERER (1982)- 8 (film is only 3 but...)
RINGO AND HIS GOLDEN PISTOL (1966) - 7 (a.k.a. JOHNNY ORO)
FURY IN THE TROPICS (1986) - 5 (Interesting Jess Franco WIP)
7 comments:
What was the quality of The Deadly Companions like for you? When I watched it for the first time the print was pretty poor. I didn't even know what was going on during the scene with the Indian and cave.
The print TCM showed was bight and clear. I'm glad I waited to see this one this way - it was a good, letterboxed presentation.
By the third viewing I finally appreciated it. How would you ranks Sam Pechinpah's movies?
What was it about Deadly Companions that made it hard to like?
And rating Peckinpah's films is rough! I like/love most of them except for CONVOY and the mess that is THE OSTERMAN WEEKEND. I guess the top five for me would be WILD BUNCH, CROSS OF IRON, BRING ME THE HEAD OF ALFREDO GARCIA, STRAW DOGS and THE BALLAD OF CABLE HOGUE.
What made it hard was the print was dark and sometimes it was difficult to tell what was going on. I knew there was some complex material like with character motivations and so on.
I'd rank his films in this order.
The Wild Bunch
Cross of Iron
Alfredo Garcia
Ride the High Country
The Getaway
Straw Dogs
Major Dundee
Pat Garrett and Billy the Kid
Cable Hogue
The Deadly Companions
The Killer Elite
Junior Bonner
Convoy
Osterman Weekend
Interesting ranking - I've always felt that Major Dundee is a little too scattered as a narrative for its own good so I would place it further down. And I like Junior Bonner more than either Deadly Companions or Killer Elite but we're spitting hairs to one degree or another now :-)
Post a Comment